Comments for silvermace.com http://silvermace.com Danushka "silvermace" Abeysuriya Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:27:45 +0000 hourly 1 Comment on Finding UID’s in MacOS X 10.5/10.6 by Guy Sherman http://silvermace.com/2010/03/finiding-uids-in-macos-x-105106/comment-page-1/#comment-887 Guy Sherman Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:27:45 +0000 http://www.silvermace.com/?p=86#comment-887 I think I've done that before, to get my laptop to work with AFS at uni, I had to change my uid on my laptop to be the same as my uid on the linux system at uni. I think I’ve done that before, to get my laptop to work with AFS at uni, I had to change my uid on my laptop to be the same as my uid on the linux system at uni.

]]> Comment on fun with numeric_limits min by Ed Smith-Rowland http://silvermace.com/2009/06/fun-with-numeric_limits-min/comment-page-1/#comment-80 Ed Smith-Rowland Sat, 17 Apr 2010 04:41:43 +0000 http://www.silvermace.com/?p=66#comment-80 I always thought this was strange and couterintuitive. They added std::numeric_limits::lowest() to C++-0x that does what min *really* should have done. I always thought this was strange and couterintuitive.
They added std::numeric_limits::lowest() to C++-0x that does what min *really* should have done.

]]> Comment on fun with numeric_limits min by EOP Exercise Round-Up: Chapter 2 « C++Next http://silvermace.com/2009/06/fun-with-numeric_limits-min/comment-page-1/#comment-79 EOP Exercise Round-Up: Chapter 2 « C++Next Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:50:08 +0000 http://www.silvermace.com/?p=66#comment-79 [...] for any integral type. Only the max() comparision is necessary for unsigned types. Because of the strange behavior of numeric_limits<T>::min when T is a floating type, a different implementation would be [...] [...] for any integral type. Only the max() comparision is necessary for unsigned types. Because of the strange behavior of numeric_limits<T>::min when T is a floating type, a different implementation would be [...]

]]> Comment on Boost signals (1.36.0) vs. sigc++ (2.0.18) by silvermace http://silvermace.com/2008/08/boost-signals-1360-vs-sigc-2018/comment-page-1/#comment-19 silvermace Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:06:14 +0000 http://www.silvermace.com/?p=8#comment-19 Hi John, no I didn't, unfortunately time hasn't allowed me to get back to this test, but I think a few projects coming up will be using the signals-slots pattern so I will post if I end up evaluating sigslot. Hi John, no I didn’t, unfortunately time hasn’t allowed me to get back to this test, but I think a few projects coming up will be using the signals-slots pattern so I will post if I end up evaluating sigslot.

]]> Comment on Boost signals (1.36.0) vs. sigc++ (2.0.18) by John http://silvermace.com/2008/08/boost-signals-1360-vs-sigc-2018/comment-page-1/#comment-18 John Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:43:29 +0000 http://www.silvermace.com/?p=8#comment-18 Did you ever get around to benchmarking sigslot? Did you ever get around to benchmarking sigslot?

]]> Comment on Getting FCollada to compile with VC++ 2008 by Waaao http://silvermace.com/2009/07/getting-fcollada-to-compile-with-vc-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-81 Waaao Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:14:20 +0000 http://www.silvermace.com/?p=73#comment-81 Wow, this is very useful, and I can use it on my VC 2008. Thanks a lot! ^_^. By the way, can the fcollada to be compiled into a static library? Wow, this is very useful, and I can use it on my VC 2008. Thanks a lot! ^_^.
By the way, can the fcollada to be compiled into a static library?

]]> Comment on WEVE by Mike http://silvermace.com/weve/comment-page-1/#comment-28 Mike Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:42:19 +0000 http://www.silvermace.com/?page_id=24#comment-28 Looks good. Ran into a bug though when attempting to run as administrator (on vista x64): System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. at Weve2.WeveMainForm.PopulateVariableList(RegistryKey src, TreeView& tree) at Weve2.WeveMainForm.WeveMainForm_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnLoad(EventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl(Boolean fIgnoreVisible) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl() at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmShowWindow(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam) Looks good. Ran into a bug though when attempting to run as administrator (on vista x64):

System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
at Weve2.WeveMainForm.PopulateVariableList(RegistryKey src, TreeView& tree)
at Weve2.WeveMainForm.WeveMainForm_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e)
at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnLoad(EventArgs e)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl(Boolean fIgnoreVisible)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl()
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmShowWindow(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)

]]> Comment on Boost signals (1.36.0) vs. sigc++ (2.0.18) by silvermace http://silvermace.com/2008/08/boost-signals-1360-vs-sigc-2018/comment-page-1/#comment-17 silvermace Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:03:55 +0000 http://www.silvermace.com/?p=8#comment-17 Hi, no I haven't yet, I should take a look at that. Thanks for the comment :) Hi, no I haven’t yet, I should take a look at that. Thanks for the comment :)

]]> Comment on Boost signals (1.36.0) vs. sigc++ (2.0.18) by Atif http://silvermace.com/2008/08/boost-signals-1360-vs-sigc-2018/comment-page-1/#comment-16 Atif Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:35:29 +0000 http://www.silvermace.com/?p=8#comment-16 Did you try running the test with the new boost::signals2 implementation? Its a rework of the original boost::signals to include thread safety. Did you try running the test with the new boost::signals2 implementation? Its a rework of the original boost::signals to include thread safety.

]]> Comment on “V 48hour film contest” by Andrew http://silvermace.com/2009/05/v-48hour-film-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-70 Andrew Sun, 07 Jun 2009 01:54:25 +0000 http://www.silvermace.com/?p=62#comment-70 Post a link? Post a link?

]]>